RESEARCH

Women in Technology Leadership | Literature Reviewed

  • Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender and Society, 4, 139-158. doi:10.1177/089124390004002002
  • Adelman, H. (1976). Authority, Influence, and Power: A Discussion. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 6, 335-351.
  • Ahuja, M. (2002). Women in the information technology profession: A literature review, synthesis and research agenda. European Journal of Information Systems, 1, 20-34. doi:10.1057/palgrave/ejis/3000417
  • Alvesson, M., & Due Billing, Y. (2009). Understanding Gender and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Anderson, C., Spataro, S., & Flynn, F. (2008). Personality and organizational culture as determinants of influence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 702-710. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.702.
  • AWIS (2008). The Pay Gap in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Professions. Retrieved December 21, 2008, from http://www.awis.org/news/documents/FINALPayGapinSTEMReport.pdf
  • Aydin, N. (2003). Gender wage differential and the under-representation of women in IT educational programs and IT workforce (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations. (Publication No. AAT 3137399).
  • Bagguley, P. (1991). The patriarchal restructuring of gender segregation. A case study of the hotel and catering industry. Sociology, 25(4), 607-625. doi:10.1177/0038038591025004004
  • Bate, P. (1990). Using the culture concept in organizational development setting. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 26, 83-106. doi:10.1177/002188639002600108
  • Bebbington, D. (2002). Women in Science, Engineering and Technology: A Review of the Issues. Higher Education Quarterly, 56(4), 360-375.
  • Becker, J., Ayman, R., & Korabik, K. (2002). Discrepancies in self/subordinates’ perceptions of leadership behavior: Leader’s gender, organizational context, and leader’s self-monitoring. Group and Organization Management, 27(2), 226–244. doi:10.1177/10501102027002004
  • Bernard, J. (1981). The Good Provider Role: Its Rise and Fall. The American
  • Psychologist, 36, 1-12.
  • Bernardi, R., & Guptill, S. (2008). Social Desirability Response Bias, Gender, and Factors Influencing Organizational Commitment: An International Study. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(4), 797-809. doi: 10.1007/s10551-007-9548-4
  • Blakely, G., Andrews, M., & Fuller, J. (2003). Are chameleons good citizens? A longitudinal study of the relationship between self-monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18(2), 131-141.
  • Boaden, R. (2006). Leadership Development: Does it make a difference? Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 27, 5-27. doi: 10.1108/01437730610641331
  • Bogdan, R., & Taylor, S. (1975). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A phenomenological approach to the social sciences. Toronto, ON: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Bolliger, D. (2008). Perceived Gender Based Stereotypes in Educational Technology Advertisements. TechTrends, 52(3), 46-52.
  • Bolman, L. G. & Deal, T. E. (2003). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Boje, D. (2000). The Isles Leadership: The Voyage of the Behaviorists. Retrieved January 6, 2007, from http://cbae.nmsu.edu/~dboje/teaching/338/behaviors.htm
  • Bresnen, M., & Marshall, N. (2000). Partnering in construction: A critical review of issues, problems and dilemmas. Construction Management and Economics, 18(2), 229–237.
  • Bryman, A. (2004). Qualitative research on leadership: A critical but appreciative review. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 729-769. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.007
  • Carayon, P., Schoepke, J., Hoonakker, P., Haims, M., & Brunette, M. (2006). Evaluating causes and consequences of turnover intention among IT workers: the development of a questionnaire survey. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(5), 381-397. doi:10.1080/01449290500102144
  • Carter, F. (2007). Double Outsiders. How Women of Color Can Succeed in Corporate America. Indianapolis, IN: JIST Publishing.
  • Cawthon, D. (1996). Leadership: The Great Man Theory Revisited. Business Horizons, 39(3), 1-4. doi:10.1016/S0007-6813(96)90001-4
  • Cellar, D., Sidle, S., Goudy, K., & O’Brien, D. (2001). Effects of leader style, leader sex, and subordinate personality on leader evaluations and future subordinate motivation. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16, 61-72.
  • Census (2009). Census 2000 and American Community Survey. Retrieved March 12, 2010, from http://www.nctcog.dst.tx.us/ris/census/
  • Child, J., & Rodrigues, S. (2003). Corporate Governance and New Organizational Forms: Issues of Double and Multiple Agency. Journal of Management & Governance, 7(4), 337-357.
  • Cohen, J., & Bennie, N. (2006). The Applicability of a Contingent Factors Model to Accounting Ethics Research. Journal of Business Ethics, 68, 1-18. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9036-2
  • Cone, J., & Foster, S. (2006). Dissertations and theses from start to finish: Psychology and related fields (2nd ed.). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Crompton, R. (1987). Gender, status and professionalism. Sociology, 21(3), 413-428. doi:10.1177/0038038587021003007
  • Dainty, A., & Lingard, H. (2006). Indirect Discrimination in Construction Organizations and the Impact on Women’s Careers. Journal of Management in Engineering, 22(3), 108-118.
  • Dalton, D. R., & Kesner, L. F. (1993). Cracks in the glass: The silent competence of women. Business Horizons, 36(2), 6-11.
  • deMarrais, K., & Tisdale, K. (2002). What happens when researchers inquire into difficult emotions? Reflections on studying women’s anger through qualitative interviews. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 115-123. doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP3702_6
  • Dijksterhuis, S., Van den Bosch, F., & Volberda, H. (1999). Where do new organizational forms come from? Management logics as a source of coevolution. Organization Science, 10(5), 569-582.
  • Donleavy, G. (2008). No Man’s Land: Exploring the Space between Gilligan and Kohlberg. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(4), 807-822. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9470-9
  • Doyle, M. E., & Smith, M. K. (2001). Classical leadership: The encyclopedia of informal education. Retrieved February 6, 2009, from http://www.infed.org/leadership/traditional_leadership.htm
  • Eagly, A., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. (2001). The leadership style of men and women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 781-797.
  • Eagly, A., & Karau, S. (1991). Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 685-710. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.5.685
  • Eylon, D., & Bamberger, P. (2000). Empowerment cognitions and empowerment acts. Group and Organizational Management, 25, 354-375. doi:10.1177/1059601100254003
  • Fitzpatrick, J. J. (1996). Women mentoring women: A phenomenological study (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations. (Publication No. AAT 9626165).
  • Flood, C. (2007). Developmental needs of women in leadership in higher education (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations. (Publication No. AAT 3286247).
  • Gilmartin, M., & D’Aunno, T. (2007). Leadership Research in Healthcare: A Review and Roadmap. Academy of Management Annals, 1, 387-438.
  • Gomez-Mejia, L., & Balkin, D. (2002). Management. New York, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies.
  • Gordon, A. (2007). Women in power: A phenomenological study of women in leadership (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations. (Publication No. AAT 3303070).
  • Goulding, C. (2005). Grounded theory, ethnography and phenomenology: a comparative analysis of three qualitative strategies for marketing research. European Journal of Marketing, 39(3), 294-309. doi:10.1108/03090560510581782
  • Green, D. (2007). Leading a Postmodern Workforce. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 6, 15-27.
  • Greenlaw, P., & Kohl, J. (1996). Providing ADA discrimination: the court’s view. Labour Law Journal, 47(6), 376-383.
  • Hays, S. (1999). Our future requires collaborative leadership. Workforce, 78(12), 30-34.
  • Headlam-Wells, J. (2004). E-mentoring for aspiring women managers. Women in Management Review, 19(4), 212-218. doi:10.1108/09649420410541281
  • Hekman, D., Aquino, K., Owens, B., Mitchell, T., Schilpzand, P., & Leavitt, K. (2010). An examination of whether and how racial and gender biases influence customer satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 238-264.
  • Heilman, M. E., Block, C. M., & Martell, R. (2001). Sex stereotypes: Do they influence perceptions of managers? Journal of Social Behavior and Psychology, 10(6), 237-252.
  • Holmes, J., & Schnurr, S. (2006). ‘Doing femininity’ at work: More than just relational practice. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10, 31-51. doi:10.1111/j.1360-6441.2006.00316.x.
  • Hsu, G., & Hannan, M. (2005). Identities, Genres, and Organizational Forms. Organization Science, 16(5), 474-494.
  • Huberman, A. M., & Miles, M. B. (2002). The qualitative researcher’s companion. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Hughes, R., & Ginnett, R., Curphy, G. (2001). Leadership: Enhancing the Lessons of Experience (4th ed.). New York, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies.
  • Ibarra, H. (1995). Race, opportunity, and diversity of social circles in managerial networks. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 673-703.
  • Ibarra, H., & Obodaru, O. (2009). Women and the Vision Thing. Harvard Business Review, 87, 62-70.
  • James, A. (1998). Mary, Mary quite contrary, how do women leaders grow? Women in Management Review, 13(2), 67-71. doi:10.1108/09649429810370080
  • Johnson, R., & Waterfield, J. (2004). Making words count: the value of qualitative research. Physiotherapy Research International, 9(3), 121-131.
  • Judy, R. W., & D’Amico, C. (1997). Workforce 2020: Work and Workers in the 21st Century. Indianapolis, IN: Hudson Institute.
  • Keating, C., Fernandez, A., Derya, A., & Kauffmann, P. (2001). A methodology for analysis of complex sociotechnical processes. Business Process Management Journal, 7, 33-49. doi: 10.1108/14637150110383926
  • Kelly, H. (2007). Racial Tokenism in the School Workplace: An Exploratory Study of Black Teachers in Overwhelmingly White Schools. Journal of the American Educational Studies Association, 41(3), 230-254. doi:10.1080/00131940701325712
  • Kerr, B., Miller, W., Reid, M., & Edwards, P. R. (2008). An Unconventional Application of the Glass Ceiling Concept: African American and Latino Administrators in Municipal Government Bureaucracies, 1987-1997. Public Administration Quarterly, 32(4), 490-527.
  • Kessler, E. H. (2001). The idols of organizational theory from Francis Bacon to the Dilbert Principle. Journal of Management Inquiry, 10(4), 283-297. doi:10.1177/1056492601104002
  • Korac-Kakabadse, A., Korac-Kakabadse, N., & Myers, A. (1998). Demographics and leadership philosophy: Exploring gender differences. Journal of Management Development, 17, 351-388. doi:10.1108/02621719810220225
  • Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. (2004). Organizational Behavior (6th ed.). New York, NY: The McGraw-Hill.
  • Lantz, P. (2008). Gender and leadership in healthcare administration: 21st century progress and challenges. Journal Of Healthcare Management, 53(5), 291-301.
  • Larkin, M., Watts, S., & Clifton, E. (2006). Giving voice and making sense in interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(1), 102-120.
  • Laslett, B., & Brenner, J. (1989). Gender and social reproduction: historical perspectives. Annual Review of Sociology, 15(1), 381-404.
  • Lemons, M., & Parzinger, M. (2001). Designing Women: A Qualitative Study of the Glass Ceiling for Women in Technology. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 1, 4-11.
  • Lewis, J. (2005). Sex Differences in Gender Role Attitudes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Lincoln, R., Jr., & Miller, J. (1979). Work and friendship ties in organizations: A comparative analysis of relational networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 181-199.
  • Lounsbury, M. & Ventresca, M. (2003). The New Structuralism in Organizational Theory. Organization, 10, 457-480. doi:10.1177/13505084030103007
  • Luthans, F. (1988). Successful vs. Effective Real Managers. Academy of Management Executive, 2(2), 127-132.
  • Luthans, F., & Peterson, S. (2002). Employee engagement and manager self-efficacy: Implications for managerial effectiveness and development. Journal of Management Development, 21(5), 376-387. doi:10.1108/02621710210426864
  • Luzadis, R., Wesolowski, M., & Snavely, B. K. (2008). Understanding Criterion Choice in Hiring Decisions from a Prescriptive Gender Bias Perspective. Journal of Management Issues, 20(4), 468-484.
  • Mainiero, E. (1994). On breaking the glass ceiling: the political seasoning of powerful women executives. Organizational Dynamics, 22(4), 5-20. doi:10.1016/0090-2616(94)90075-2
  • Manzanares, M., Rico, R., & Gil, F. (2008). Designing Organizations: Does Expertise Matter? Journal of Business and Psychology, 23(3), 87-103.
  • McCartney, W. W., & Campbell, C. (2006). Leadership, management, and derailment: A model of individual success and failure. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 27(3), 157–161. doi:10.1108/01437730610657712
  • McFarlane, J. R. (1990). A Perspective on Women’s Place in Work. Management Services, 34(3), 16-17.
  • Miller, D., & Karakowsky, L. (2005). Gender influences as an impediment to knowledge sharing: when men and women fail to seek peer feedback. The Journal of Psychology, 139, 101-118.
  • Mills, G. E. (2003). Introduction to Education Research (1st ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  • Mills, G. E. (2007). Action Research: A Guide for the Teacher Researcher (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • National Science Board (2005). National Science Board Roundtable on the Science and Technology Workforce. Retrieved May 15, 2005, from http://democrats.science.house.gov/Media/File/Events/05jun23Workforce/langford_nsb_05jun23.pdf
  • NCWIT (2007). NCWIT Scorecard 2007: A Report on the Status of Women in Information Technology. Retrieved July 13, 2008, from http://www.ncwit.org/pdf/2007_Scorecard_Web.pdf
  • Neuman, W. L. (2003). Social Research Methods (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Nicholson, K., Hancock, D., & Dahlberg, T. (2007). Preparing Teachers and Counselors to Help Under-Represented Populations Embrace the Information Technology Field. Journal of Technology & Teacher Education, 15, 123-143.
  • Olsson, S. (2001). Book Review: The Handbook of Gender and Work. Women in Management Review, 16(3), 146-148.
  • Page, T. L. (2005). A phenomenological study of female executives in information technology companies in the Washington, D.C. area (Doctoral dissertation) Retrieved from Dissertations & Theses at University of Phoenix. (Publication No. AAT 3158527).
  • Perrone, K., Sedlacek, W., & Alexander, C. (2001). Gender and ethnic difference in career goal attainment. Career Development Quarterly, 50(2), 168-178.
  • Priest, H. (2002). An approach to the phenomenological analysis of data. Nurse Researcher, 10(2), 50-63.
  • QSR International. (n. d.). Qualitative research. Retrieved February 12, 2010, from http://www.qsr.com.au/
  • Reid, M. (2007). Mentoring and women’s advancement to leadership in the information technology field: A qualitative case study (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations. (Publication No. AAT 3286258).
  • Ridgeway, C. (2001). Gender, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 637-655.
  • Ridgeway, C., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1999). The gender system and interaction. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 191-216.
  • Riley, S. (2003). The Management of the Traditional Male Role: A discourse analysis of the constructions and functions of provision. Journal of Gender Studies, 12(2), 99-113. doi:10.1080/0958923032000088300
  • Rodan, S., & Galunic, C. (2002). Knowledge heterogeneity in managerial networks and its effect on individual performance. Academy of Management Proceedings, 6, 1-6.
  • Rozier, C., & Hersh-Cochran, M. (1996). Gender Differences in Managerial Characteristics in a Female-dominated Health Profession. Health Care Supervision, 14(4), 57-70.
  • Rusaw, A. (2001). Leading Public Organizations: An Interactive Approach. Orlando, FL: Harcourt, Inc.
  • Rutherford, S. (2001). Organizational cultures, women managers and exclusion. Women in Management Review, 16, 371–382. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000006289
  • Rutledge, L. (2007). Motivating African American women to lead in American corporations (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations. (Publication No. AAT 3283982).
  • Ryan, M. K. & Haslem, S. A. (2005). The Glass Cliff: Evidence that Women are Over-Represented in Precarious Leadership Positions. British Journal of Management, 16(2), 81-103. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00433.x.
  • Scherer, R., & Petrick, J. (2001). The effects of gender role orientation on team schema: a multivariate analysis of indicators in a US federal health care organization. The Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 7-22.
  • Schermerhorn, J., Hunt. J., & Osborn, R. (2000). Organizational Behavior (7th ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Schneer, J. A., & Reitman, F. (2002). Managerial life without a wife: Family structure and managerial career success. Journal of Business Ethics, 37, 25-38.
  • Scott, W. R., & Davis, G. F. (2007). Organizations and organizing: Rational, natural, and open systems perspectives. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Shank, G. (2006). Qualitative Research: A Personal Skills Approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Shin, M. (2007). Minority Report. Corporate Knights Magazine. Retrieved December 14, 2008, from http://www.corporateknights.ca/magazine-issues/39-2007-cleantech-issue/85-minority-report.html
  • Simpson, R. (2000). Gender mix and organisational fit: how gender imbalance at different levels of the organisation impacts on women managers. Women in Management Review, 15, 5-19. doi:10.1108/09649420010310173
  • Smith, S. (2004). Career Barriers among Information Technology Undergraduate Majors. Information Technology, Learning & Performance Journal, 22, 49-56.
  • Smith, E. (2007). Gender influence on firm-level entrepreneurship through the power structure of boards. Women in Management Review, 22(3), 168-186. doi:10.1108/09649420710743644
  • Sumner, M., & Niederman, F. (2003). The impact of gender differences on job satisfaction, job turnover, and career experiences of information systems professionals. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44(2), 29-39.
  • Tang, J., & Smith, E. (1996). Women and Minorities in American Professions. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Thomas, K., Bierema, L., & Landau, H. (2004). Advancing women’s leadership in academe: New directions for research and HRD practice. Equal Opportunities International, 23(7), 62-67.
  • Trochim, W. M. (2004). Nonprobability sampling. Retrieved May 18, 2009, from http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/sampnon.php
  • U.S. Department of Commerce (2003). Education and Training for the Information Technology Workforce: Report to Congress from the Secretary of Commerce.
  • United States Department of Labor (2007). Women in the Labor Force: A Databook. Retrieved July 13, 2008, from http://www.bls.gov/cps/wlf-databook2007.htm
  • U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2009). Occupational Outlook Handbook (OOH), 2010-11 Edition. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved March 4, 2010, from http://www.bls.gov/OCO/
  • Vinnecombe, S., & Singh, V. (2003). Locks and Keys to the Boardroom. Women in Management Review, 18(6), 325-333. doi:10.1108/09649420310491495
  • Washington.edu (2002). What is electronic and information technology? Retrieved March 14, 2010, from http://www.washington.edu/accessit/articles?106
  • Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409-421.
  • Wellington, S., Kropf, M. B., & Gerkovich, P. R. (2003). What’s holding women back? Harvard Business Review, 81(6), 18-19.
  • Westerman, J., & Cyr, L. (2004). An integrative analysis of person-organization fit theories. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 262-261.
  • Wilding, C., & Whiteford, G. (2005). Phenomenological research: An exploration of conceptual, theoretical, and practical issues. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 25, 98-104.
  • Wilson, M. (2004). Closing the leadership gap: Why women can and must help run the world. New York, NY: Penguin Group.
  • Woodilla, J., & Forray, J. (2006). Justice and the Political in Organizational Life: A Narrative Inquiry. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17, 4-19.
  • Wright, R. (1996). Women in computer work: Controlled progress in a technical occupation. In Women and Minorities in American Professions. Edited by Joyce Tang and Earl Smith, published by State University of New York Press, Albany.
  • Young, A. M., & Hurlic, D. (2007). Gender enactment at work: The importance of gender and gender-related behavior to person-organizational fit and career decisions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(2), 168-187. doi: 10.1108/02683940710726429
  • Zajac, E. J., & Westphal, J. D. (2004). The Social Construction of Market Value: Institutionalization and Learning Perspectives on Stock Market Reactions. American Sociological Review, 69(3), 433-458. doi:10.1177/000312240406900306
  • Zuckerman, E. W., & Kim, T. Y. (2003). The crucial tradeoff: Identity assignment and box-office success in the feature-film industry. Industrial Corporate Change, 12, 27-67.